Legal Opinion

Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Morehouse

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1901PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for "Washington county; James J. Dick, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff filed a petition in the circuit court for said county, stating, in substance, that it is a railway corporation entitled to the benefit of the statutes of this state for the acquirement by such corporations of real estate necessary for their use, by the exercise of the power of eminent domain; and further stating all the facts required by law to entitle it to take certain…

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for "Washington county; James J. Dick, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff filed a petition in the circuit court for said county, stating, in substance, that it is a railway corporation entitled to the benefit of the statutes of this state for the acquirement by such corporations of real estate necessary for their use, by the exercise of the power of eminent domain; and further stating all the facts required by law to entitle it to take certain real estate described and to have commissioners appointed to appraise the same and -determine the compensation to be…

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.

Sec. 1831a, Stats. 1898, provides that, “ every railway company existing in whole or in part under any law of this state and operating a railway therein may build, maintain and operate branches and spur tracks from its road or any branch thereof to and upon the grounds of any mill, elevator, storehouse, warehouse, dock, wharf, pier, manufacturing establishment, lumber yard, coal dock or other industry or enterprise .... ; and may acquire by purchase or condemnation, in the manner provided in this chapter for the acquisition of real estate for railway *6purposes, other than for its main track,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. New Central Coal Co. v. George's Creek Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  3. Bankhead v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Whiting v. Sheboygan & Fond Du Lac RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Railroad Co. v. Iron-WorksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Henderson v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Sisson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Ulmer v. Lime Rock RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
  4. Riden v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington R. R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. Riley v. Charleston Union Station Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API