Legal Opinion

Mihalka v. Shepherd

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2008No. 33571PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal arises from an award of costs and attorney fees pursuant to a settlement agreement. Eugene and Joni Shepherd appeal from the district court’s decision awarding costs and attorney fees to Michael and Linda Mihalka. We affirm the decision of the district court.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The parties are next-door neighbors and own adjoining parcels of land. On April 9, 2004, the Mihalkas filed suit against the Shepherds alleging breach of covenants and restrictions, nuisance, trespass, and aggravated assault. 1 The parties participated in mediation wherein…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Eighteen Mile Ranch, LLC v. Nord Excavating & Paving, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. McPheters v. MaileIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bondy v. LevyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wilson v. BogertIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. VANDERFORD CO., INC. v. KnudsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Douglas Visser v. Auto Alley, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Bailey v. Birch (In re Birch)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Inclusion, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API