Legal Opinion

State v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 14, 2001No. C99-01-30487; CA A106371PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

The state appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s suppression of evidence discovered in a bubble bottle during an inventory of defendant’s car. ORS 138.060(3). The state argues that the warrantless search of the closed bubble container was valid because the container “announced its contents” to the officer. Alternatively, the state argues that the search of the container was valid under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. We conclude that the container in question did not announce its contents, and that the automobile exception is not applicable to these circumstances.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. HerbertOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. KruchekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. LanigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. GetzelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. StockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. CurrinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API