United States v. Juventino Mejia-Orosco
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge, and LITTLE * , District Judge. PER CURIAM:
On petition for rehearing, Mejia-Orosco correctly points out that 18 U.S.C. § 3742(d), now renumbered § 3742(e), was amended in November of 1988 by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. See P.L. 100-690, reprinted in 1988 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News at 102 Stat. 4181, 4417. Neither side reported this amendment in its briefs, or at oral argument. However, the amendment supports our original opinion, to which we adhere.
Prior to November 18, 1988, section 3742(d) stated, in part,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Juventino Mejia-OroscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by77 opinions
- United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Eddie Wayne RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alvaro HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Melody ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.