Legal Opinion

United States v. Juventino Mejia-Orosco

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1989No. 88-5584PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge, and LITTLE * , District Judge. PER CURIAM:

On petition for rehearing, Mejia-Orosco correctly points out that 18 U.S.C. § 3742(d), now renumbered § 3742(e), was amended in November of 1988 by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. See P.L. 100-690, reprinted in 1988 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News at 102 Stat. 4181, 4417. Neither side reported this amendment in its briefs, or at oral argument. However, the amendment supports our original opinion, to which we adhere.

Prior to November 18, 1988, section 3742(d) stated, in part,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Juventino Mejia-OroscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Eddie Wayne RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Alvaro HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Melody ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API