Legal Opinion

Foster v. Foster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1936No. 32,962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This action was instituted as a divorce action. The phase of the case with which we are interested has to do with the title to, and right to possession of, an automobile. Judgment in the court below was in favor of the plaintiff in the divorce action, awarding her possession of the automobile. The defendant investment company appeals.

Samuel Foster was a hotel clerk. He was the husband of Minerva. She worked in an insurance office. An automobile had been purchased from a motor company in the name of Mr. Foster. The evidence is plain that it…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lames v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Julius v. DruckreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Dowd v. HeusonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Rodgers v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Parker v. SweetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seacord v. Commerce Bank of Blue Hills (In Re Seacord)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
  2. Lee v. DunbarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Hess-Harrington, Inc. v. State Exchange BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. In Re RiceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API