Legal Opinion
Saigh v. Common Council of Petoskey
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 53, Calendar No. 34,820PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Plaintiff came to tbe city of Petoskey in July, 1929, intending to engage in selling at public auction, during the summer and resort season of that year, linens, laces, embroideries, and rugs, having rented a store building for the purpose. He was informed by the city clerk that he could not auction linens, laces, and embroideries because of an ordinance of the city. To test the ordinance plaintiff filed this bill. The ordinance was held valid. Plaintiff has appealed.
We quote a section of the ordinance:
“It shall be unlawful for any person or persons, firm or corporation, to sell, dispose of,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. . Beakes Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- People v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Biddles, Inc. v. EnrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Holsman v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Mogul v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Steinberg-Baum & Co. v. Dayton CountrymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- ABC Liquidators, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Jones v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
- Gudbrandsen v. PeltoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Moore v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.