Stitham v. Henderson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.
[¶ 1] John C. Henderson appeals from the summary judgment of the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J.) in favor of David B. Stitham, declaring that Henderson is not the biological father of the minor child K.M.H. and declaring that Stitham is the child’s biological father. Henderson further appeals from the order denying his motion to dismiss in which he requested a dismissal of Stitham’s complaint on the basis of res judicata. Henderson also appeals the order dismissing his counterclaim in which he sought to establish his equitable parental rights. We affirm the judgment and orders…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rideout v. RiendeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- In Re Shane T.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Cyr v. Adamar Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Boulanger v. ComeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- State Department of Human Services v. WebsterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- C.E.W. v. D.E.W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Matthew W. Pitts v. Amanda M. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Philbrook v. TheriaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Young v. YoungSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- James R. Eaton v. Kelly L. ParadisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.