Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marriott v. Cappello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 2017No. 387 CA 16-01357Published

1Dissent

Smith, J.P.

(dissenting). I respectfully disagree with the majority that defendant or his expert were required to take any action to protect plaintiff’s rights, and I therefore dissent. There is no dispute that plaintiff’s attorney and a nurse accompanied plaintiff to the office of defendant’s expert for the previously scheduled psychological examination, and that plaintiff’s attorney left the office before the examination began. There is no indication that plaintiff’s attorney inquired whether the nurse would be permitted to observe the examination, or that the attorney asked the defense…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Ughetto v. AcrishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Gray v. Crouse-Irving Memorial Hospital, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. A.W. v. County of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. In re Rosemary ZZ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API