United States v. St. Mary's Railway West, LLC
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court are Defendant Claudius Strickland’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant St. Mary’s Railway West, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and the United States of America’s Motion for Partial *1359Summary Judgment. Dkt. Nos. 8-9, 18. Upon due consideration, Strickland’s motion is DENIED, St. Mary’s motion is DENIED, and the Government’s motion is GRANTED.
I. Factual Background
This action is predicated upon unauthorized discharges into wetlands during the construction of spur and side tracks. See Dkt. No. 1. The following factual summary is…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Friends of Eel River v. North Coast Ry. Auth.California Supreme Court · 2017