Legal Opinion
(PC) Fredrickson v. Baniga
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 11, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00398Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WARREN FREDRICKSON, No. 1:20-cv-00398-DAD-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 13 v. (Doc. No. 18) 14 U. BANIGA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Warren Frederickson (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On August 31, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s First Amended 20 Complaint and issued findings and recommendations recommending that this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Howard Turner Mary Turner Bill Oskowski Marisa Oskowski v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Thayer C. Lindauer and Helen Lindauer, Husband and Wife v. Thomas M. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- David Henry v. Adventist Health Castle Med.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020