Legal Opinion

Feeney v. Graef

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner father instituted this proceeding against respondent mother in Hamilton County Family Court. The petition seeks to modify a prior *942order of Monroe County Family Court by curtailing respondent’s court-ordered visitation with the parties’ son. By leave of this Court, respondent appeals from an order of Monroe County Family Court transferring the proceeding from Monroe County to Hamilton County Family Court. Respondent contends that the order of transfer must be reversed because it erroneously recites that neither party lives in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fusco v. RothNew York City Family Court · 1979
  2. Garner v. ForsytheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Vanloan v. DillenbeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arcuri v. OsunaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Robertson v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Winter v. KarinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Michelle A.S. v. Samuel G.F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Winter v. KarinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API