Legal Opinion

Rouse & Associates, Inc. v. Delp

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1995No. 2598 and 2670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

We are here concerned about the effect of restrictions imposed upon the alienability of the shares of stock of a family owned corporation upon execution by a creditor against one of the shareholders. The trial court held that (1) the restrictive covenant did not prevent the involuntary sale of the debtor’s stock, but (2) the purchaser took title subject to the terms of the restrictions imposed by the stockholders’ agreement. Both parties appealed. We affirm.

Rouse and Associates, Inc. (Rouse) recovered a judgment against W. Paúl Delp in the amount of $6,132,201.8s. 1 It also…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mather EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Marriage of Castonguay v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Elliott v. LindquistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Fitzsimmons v. LindsaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Bechtold v. Coleman Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seven Springs Farm, Inc. v. CrokerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. AB & T National Bank v. Mossy Dell, Inc. (In re Beauchamp)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2012
  3. Seven Springs Farm, Inc. v. CrokerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Seven Springs Farm, Inc. v. CrokerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API