Byrd v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
SIMS, Chief Justice.
Appellants, .Connie Byrd and Sam Wet-more, on a joint trial were convicted of illegally possessing intoxicating liquor in local option territory for the purpose of sale and the punishment of each was fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in jail for 30 days. On their motion for an appeal they insist: (a) that the trial judge erred in not excluding the evidence obtained under a void search warrant which was not signed by the county judge; . (b) had this incompetent evidence been exclud*438ed, there was no evidence to sustain' the conviction.
There is no contrariety in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Youman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Bryan v. KerSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Divine v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- State ex rel. Davis v. Police Jury of Webster ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- De Attley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PellegriniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- State v. CochraneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. SurowieckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- People v. HentkowskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Turner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.