Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 9, 1953PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMS, Chief Justice.

Appellants, .Connie Byrd and Sam Wet-more, on a joint trial were convicted of illegally possessing intoxicating liquor in local option territory for the purpose of sale and the punishment of each was fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in jail for 30 days. On their motion for an appeal they insist: (a) that the trial judge erred in not excluding the evidence obtained under a void search warrant which was not signed by the county judge; . (b) had this incompetent evidence been exclud*438ed, there was no evidence to sustain' the conviction.

There is no contrariety in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Youman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Bryan v. KerSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Divine v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. State ex rel. Davis v. Police Jury of Webster ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  5. De Attley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PellegriniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. State v. CochraneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. SurowieckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. People v. HentkowskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Turner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API