Legal Opinion

Pistolesi v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 21, 1945No. 22451-RPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative, a new trial.

The action was brought to recover under the double indemnity provisions of two life insurance policies. Verdict was rendered for the plaintiff.

The evidence in this case — in the Court’s opinion — -was clear and convincing that the insured met his death solely through accidental means.

In considering these motions, although there are several questions raised, there is only one main question which is controlling, and that is, whether the death of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Narver v. California State Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pac. Heating & Ventilating Co. v. Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co. of BrooklynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Ogburn v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Anderson v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Welch v. British American Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Jean v. Great American Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API