Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Edwards

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Multnomah.: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Action at law by the firm of Meyer & Strom against H. E. Edwards. Plaintiffs had a judgment, hence this appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bean.

This is an action commenced in a justice’s court for rent of certain premises in the City of Portland, alleged to have been leased by plaintiffs to the defendant. The complaint is in the usual form, and the answer consists of specific denials of the allegations thereof. The trial in the justice’s court resulting in a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendant appealed to the circuit court, and there moved for permission to amend his answer by adding thereto an affirmative defense to the effect that the premises were leased by plaintiffs to one May Hastings as a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waggy v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whipple v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Higgins v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Credit Service Co. v. StierlyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Robinson v. CarlonOregon Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API