Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1910No. 21,528PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From Sullivan Circuit Court; O. B. Harris, Special Judge. Prosecution by The State of Indiana against Belle S. Hinkle. From a judgment of conviction, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Appellant was convicted of arson, and assigns error on the overruling of her motion for a new trial. The grounds of the motion for a new trial will be considered in their order.

1. Appellant filed an application, verified by her affidavit, for a change of venue from Sullivan county, on account of excitement and prejudice against her in that county. The State filed the counter-affidavits of thirty men, who stated that they were acquainted with a large number of the citizens of the county, that there was no excitement or prejudice against appellant, that they were disinterested, and believed she…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hauk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Trustees of Brimfield v. Commissioners of PortageOhio Supreme Court · 1840
  4. Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Bissot v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leach v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Kennedy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. McClardOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Scheerer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API