Legal Opinion

Howard v. Spragins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 23, 1977Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants, Amy Camelia Howard, et al., appeal from a judgment authorizing and ordering appellee, First Alabama Bank of Huntsville, N.A. (Bank), as trustee, to pay a judgment for child support out of the corpus of two trusts.

The issue presented is whether the trustee, Bank, may legally pay child support payments from the corpus of the two trusts, notwithstanding the spendthrift provision1 in each trust. We hold that the trustee may do so with respect to the 1970 testamentary trust. We, therefore, affirm in part and reverse in part.

On March 30, 1976, appellee, Anna Ruth W. Spragins, filed a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moorehead's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Zouck v. ZouckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Shelley v. ShelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dillon v. DillonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. In re the Estate of ChusidNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API