Legal Opinion

Bandar v. Hayes-Walsh

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 18, 2013No. MICV201202800DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Krupp, Peter B., J.

This action is before the court on the motion by defendant Margaret Maiy Hayes-Walsh (“Hayes-Walsh”) to dismiss the complaint under Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). After hearing on Februaiy 20, 2013, for the following reasons, the motion is ALLOWED. Because this decision affects plaintiffs claim against defendant Margaret M. Morrissey (“Morrissey”) (see footnote 4 below), the court has also included below a scheduling order with respect to the claim against Morrissey.

Background

The Complaint (“Compl.”) alleges the following facts, which the court accepts as true for purposes of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Schaer v. Brandeis UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Curtis v. Herb Chambers I-95, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API