Legal Opinion

Green v. Appleton Woolen Mills

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tlie circuit court for Outa-gamie county: John Goodlattc>, Circuit Judge. On October 13, 1911, plaintiff was employed by the defendant and was fifteen years old. He was injured while engaged in the operation of a carding machine, and brings this action to recover damages for such injury.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of tlie circuit court for Outa-gamie county: John Goodlattc>, Circuit Judge. On October 13, 1911, plaintiff was employed by the defendant and was fifteen years old. He was injured while engaged in the operation of a carding machine, and brings this action to recover damages for such injury. The machine at which he was employed consisted of a large middle or center roller, around which revolved a number of smaller rollers, the surface of the smaller rollers being coated with a wire mesh, brush-like with very small teeth, and by means of this combination of rollers the…

1Opinion of the CourtBaRnes, J.

The appellant argues that the judgment is erroneous (1) because no guardian ad litem was properly appointed; (2) because the case falls within the Workmen's Compensation Act; (3) because so much of sub. 2, sec. 1728a, Stats. 1911 (ch. 479, Laws 1911), as prohibited the employment of minors under the age of sixteen years in operating carding machines is void as to defendant, in that it impaired the obligation of a contract; (4) because such portion of said act denies due process of law, in that it is arbitrary and not the result of a legitimate exercise of the police power, and is therefore…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Manitowoc v. Manitowoc & Northern Traction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pinoza v. Northern Chair Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Sharon v. Winnebago Furniture Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Hafern v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Hepp v. HuefnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. D.L. Ex Rel. Friederichs v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Twin City Building & Investment Co. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Ortega v. Salt Lake Wet Wash LaundryUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Warshafsky v. the Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Reiten v. J. S. Stearns Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API