State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers State Bank

To the application of the principle announced by this court in State v. Farmers State Bank, ante, p. 532, as controlling in the two companion cases of the same title, one *548wherein Freeman E. Runquist et al. are interveners, and one in which Lewis S. Loomer is intervener, we again respectfully dissent.

These are companion cases. The facts in the Runquist case are so interwoven with the case first referred to as to present identical questions of both law and fact. The Loomer case involves the same general considerations. But, in addition to general propositions common to the three cases, the…