DuBignon v. Wright
Supreme Court of Georgia
Equitable petition. Before Judge Parker. Glynn superior court. July 14, 1904.
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
“ The defendant below was not entitled to open and conclude because he did not, by admissions in his answer, make out a prima facie case for the plaintiff and thus relieve him from the necessity of introducing evidence. Admissions made by a defendant for the purpose of gaining this advantage must be in his pleadings and not merely oral." Dorough v. Johnson, 108 Ga. 812, and cases there cited. The ruling above laid down is *264applicable to the case now under consideration; and the judgment of the court below is, therefore, Affirmed.
Argued January 30, — Decided March 4, 1905. Equitable petition.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dorough v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shields v. BodenhamerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- International Indemnity Co. v. CoachmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- State Highway Department v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Barfield v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- International Indemnity Co. v. CoachmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.