Barfield v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. “In an action upon a promissory note, to entitle the defendant to the opening and conclusion, he must, before the plaintiff has introduced any evidence, admit in his written plea the execution ,of the note sued upon and that the plaintiff is the legal holder thereof.” Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Brantley, 20 Ga. App. 774 (93 S. E. 237) ; Coker v. Citizens Bank, 35 Ga. App. 595 (2) (134 S. E. 355). Mere oral admissions made in open court are not sufficient for this purpose. Dorough v. Johnson, 108 Ga. 812 (34 S. E. 168) ; DuBignon v. Wright, 122 Ga. 263 (50 S. E. 65).
2. In the instant suit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dorough v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- DuBignon v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Coker v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- Frost v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958