Legal Opinion

Barfield v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1931No. 20666PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “In an action upon a promissory note, to entitle the defendant to the opening and conclusion, he must, before the plaintiff has introduced any evidence, admit in his written plea the execution ,of the note sued upon and that the plaintiff is the legal holder thereof.” Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Brantley, 20 Ga. App. 774 (93 S. E. 237) ; Coker v. Citizens Bank, 35 Ga. App. 595 (2) (134 S. E. 355). Mere oral admissions made in open court are not sufficient for this purpose. Dorough v. Johnson, 108 Ga. 812 (34 S. E. 168) ; DuBignon v. Wright, 122 Ga. 263 (50 S. E. 65).

2. In the instant suit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dorough v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. DuBignon v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Coker v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frost v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API