Government of France v. Isbrandtsen-Moller Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Respondent moves (1) to dismiss the above entitled action upon the ground that it had not been properly commenced prior to the severance of diplomatic relations between this country and France and could not be commenced thereafter; and (2) to strike from the files of the clerk of this court a verification of the amended libel, signed by the former French Ambassador to this country, upon the ground that it was filed on November 9, 1942, on which date the Government of France did not have access to the courts of this country.
This is an action to recover demurrage and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Ex Parte MuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- The SapphireSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pfizer, Inc. v. LordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Republic of Vietnam v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Chemical Natural Resources, Inc. v. Republic of VenezuelaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Dade Drydock Corp. v. the M/T Mar CaribeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
- Sarazin v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.