Driggs Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employee's Local Union No 361
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By RICHARDS, J.
The defendants allege in their pleadings that an economic or trade dispute exists between them and the plaintiff, but the evidence fails to sustain such an allegation. The evidence does show that the plaintiff and the defendants do not have, nor have they had, any business relations with one another and that the difficulty between the parties arose by reason of the conduct of the defendants in undertaking to call a strike and in persisting in enforcing a boycott without any just cause.
The defendants further contend that the plaintiff has failed to comply with the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harvey v. ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- S. A. Clark Lunch Co. v. Cleveland Waiters LocalOhio Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blossom Dairy Co. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
- Keith Theatre Inc. v. VachonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
- Lyle v. Local No. 452, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers WorkmenTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
- Johnson v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Union, Local No. 854Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Paducah Newspapers, Inc. v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.