Legal Opinion

National Machinery Exchange, Inc. v. Peninsular Equipment Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herman Cahn, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

In this almost classic “battle of the forms,” defendant, a Michigan corporation, orally agreed to purchase certain machinery from plaintiff for $100,000, and sent plaintiff a $10,000 deposit. Plaintiff then confirmed the sale by sending *459its invoice to defendant. One of the terms included on the invoice was that New York, where plaintiff is located, would have jurisdiction of any disputes arising under the agreement. Defendant claims that it took exception to the invoice and refused to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Instrument Corp. v. Tie Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. TRWL Financial Establishment v. Select International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Sweetapple Plastics, Inc. v. Shuman (In Re Sweetapple Plastics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1987
  4. Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. v. Sam's European Tailoring, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Duro Textiles, LLC v. Sunbelt Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API