Legal Opinion

Randall v. Bird

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1925No. 25,872PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was deliverd by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff commenced this action to set aside the will of Alice Fink on the ground that she was not of sound and *342disposing mind and memory and on the ground that she was under the influence of Nettie Bird, the principal beneficiary under the will, and of I. F. Bradley, the person who drew the will. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff on the ground that Alice Fink was not of sound mind and memory at the time the will was made. The defendants appeal.

The assignment of errors, stated in several forms, may be reduced to one…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bradley v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Gilpin v. BurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Huston v. TowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Bolinger v. MoorhouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Smith v. SalthouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API