Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1967No. Crim. 357PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of grand larceny of farm machinery and moved for a new trial. The trial court denied his motion, and he appeals to this court from the order denying the motion for new trial, urging two grounds in support of his appeal:

1. That the evidence was insufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction, and that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the evidence; and

2. That the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

The evidence of the State discloses that an Allis-Chalmers tractor,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BraathenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. JagerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. GraberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. RamstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. ShepardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. McLainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. KleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API