Legal Opinion
City of Baton Rouge v. Smuggy's Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 2014No. 2014-CA-0134PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrain, J.
jjn this expropriation proceeding, the landowner appeals the trial court’s judgment that, in pertinent part, dismissed the landowner’s claim for an increase in compensation. The landowner challenges the trial court’s determination that the expropriating authority did not waive its right to plead abandonment when its counsel attended a deposition after the accrual of the abandonment period. We reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On June 8, 2000, the City of Baton Rouge and the Parish of East Baton Rouge (collectively “City-Parish”) filed suit against Smuggy’s Corporation, Inc.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Clark v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. JacobsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Cochran v. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Palmetto Oil Co. v. Bethany Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doucette v. GuientLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Gina Moise, Robert Southard, Jr. and Kevin Southard, Individually and on behalf of Betty Sue Southard (D) v. Baton Rouge General Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023