Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Attorney General
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 15, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00422Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JAMES P. BAILEY, : : Plaintiff, : : Case No. 1:23-cv-422 v. : : MERRICK B. GARLAND, et al., : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : Defendants. : : OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff James P. Bailey (“Plaintiff”) is a convicted felon that believes that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)’s prohibition against the possession of firearms by felons is unconstitutional as applied to him. Plaintiff implies that while violent felons should not possess firearms, the Second Amendment has left the door open for “nonviolent” felons like him to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.