Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 5, 1978No. C77-06-07980 CA 9695PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

Defendant appeals from the sentence imposed following her guilty plea to theft in the first degree as charged. The accusatory instrument charged defendant with "theft of one (1) ladies dinner ring with one large sapphire surrounded by diamonds, the property of Mr. and Mrs. Harry C. Murphy.”

Defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term not to exceed five years, execution of which was suspended, and defendant was placed on probation for five years. A condition of probation is that defendant make restitution to Mr. and Mrs. Murphy in the amount of $5,585. On appeal, defendant contends that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BusseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. BraughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cumhuriyet v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. MadrilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. BauschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API