Legal Opinion
Minaker v. Adams
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 1921No. Civ. No. 3850PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court dismissing a writ of review and affirming all the proceedings of the board of medical examiners of the state of California in revoking appellant’s license to practice medicine and surgery in the state of California.
The action of the medical board was taken after a hearing duly and regularly had upon a complaint charging appellant “with having been guilty of unprofessional conduct under the 1st subdivision of section 14 of the Medical Practice Act of the state of California [Stats. 1917, p. 93], by . . . procuring, aiding and abetting and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Lanterman v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- City of Los Angeles v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Thrasher v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Karry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dyment v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Cooley v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Young v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928