Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Delaney

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNull, J.

In the absence of a reply by the petitioner, setting in issue the new matter contained in the answer of the respondents, the ultimate facts alleged in the affirmative defense must be deemed admitted. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1292; People ex rel. Ajas v. Board of Education, 104 App. Div. 162; Bentley v. Jeacock, 14 N. Y. S. 2d 366.) The denials contained in the answer are perfunctory and raise no triable issue of fact. The questions of law may, therefore, be treated summarily. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1295.)

Petitioner asserts that he, and the eleven others on whose behalf this proceeding is brought, were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Cowen v. ReavyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. People Ex Rel. Sweeney v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Colbert v. DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Davis v. WienerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Matter of Colbert v. DelaneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Board of Stadium & Memorial AuditoriumNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Leidman v. ReidNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Kirkpatrick v. ReidNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API