Leidman v. Reid
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
If the increments sought by petitioner were mandatory during the period that he was absent in the military service, he would be entitled to such increments under section 245 of the Military Law, since they would constitute part of his salary or compensation within the meaning of that statute (Timmerman v. Board of Education of City of N. Y., 274 App. Div. 934; Silverstein v. Board of Education of City of N. Y., 190 Misc. 588, affd. 190 Misc. 990, affd. 273 App. Div. 990). In the cited cases the increments became part of the salaries of the teachers who sued the board of education, under the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colbert v. DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Matter of Colbert v. DelaneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Silverstein v. Board of EducationCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947
- Eagle v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Timmerman v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Strauss v. ReidNew York Supreme Court · 1950