Lightner v. Hardison
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUTIERREZ, Judge.
William and Marcia Lightner filed a civil rights complaint alleging that in terminating their visiting privileges, the Idaho Department of Correction (IDOC) violated their constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution as well as their Idaho State Constitutional rights. The Lightners appeal the district court’s order granting respondents John Hardison, Brent Reinke, and Steve Nelson’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
In an underlying criminal case, William was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Faron Lovelace v. Robin SandyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Lee J. Brainard and Carolyn P. Brainard, husband and wife v. City of Coeur D’ Alene, Idaho a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of IdahoDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
- O-KelIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011