Legal Opinion

York v. Clow

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 6, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The defendant, who owned and operated a sawmill in Wolfeboro, employed the plaintiff, an independent contractor, to repair the safety-valve of a steam-boiler located in the mill. The blow-off or waste-pipe ran from the safety-valve out through the south wall of the boiler-room about nine feet from the ground. The engine-room adjoined the boiler-room on the east, and the two rooms were separated merely by a movable pipe-rail. The dynamo-room adjoined the boiler-room on the west.

After the plaintiff had repaired the valve, he took his tools to the chest in the dynamo-room and remained there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  2. Cable v. Donahue & Hamlin, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  3. Straw v. Pittsfield Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  4. Lavoie v. Nashua Gummed & Coated Paper Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  5. Colby v. Treisman Bros.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API