Legal Opinion

Pollitt v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 20, 1996No. 9, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

In this case we are called upon to decide whether the Court of Special Appeals erred in holding that when a juror is excused immediately after the jury is sworn with no alternates, the trial judge may sua sponte select a replacement juror without allowing the defendant an additional peremptory challenge. We hold that the Court of Special Appeals did err, and we reverse.

I

In the early morning hours of Christmas day 1994, Petitioner, Frederick Pollitt, went to his mother-in-law’s house to visit his estranged wife. An argument erupted outside the house between Petitioner and his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Spencer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. State v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. State v. GorwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Reemsnyder v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stokes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  3. Booze v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Hayes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API