Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dunham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1899No. Appeal, No. 169PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 169, Jan. T., 1897, by defendant, from judgment of S. C., Jan. T., 1896, No. 156, from judgment and sentence of Q. S. Lycoming Co., Dec. T., 1894, No. 13. Appeal from Superior Court. The case was reported in 4 Pa. Superior Ct. 74. Error assigned was judgment of Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice McCollum,

The defendant was indicted and tried in the court of quarter sessions of Lycoming county, for a violation of an act of assembly approved April 17,1846, and extended to said county by the act of April 13, 1854. In the special verdict rendered by the jury it appeared that he had exhibited and offered for sale, from door to door, in the borough of Jersey Shore in the county of Lycoming, for cash, or on the instalment plan, certain goods, to wit: clothes wringers, bed springs, clocks, lace curtains, table spreads, albums, silverware, rugs and lamps; and that of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Commonwealth v. GardnerSchuylkill County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1890
  3. Commonwealth v. HarmelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WhitcomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Prior v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Town of Green River v. Fuller Brush Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  4. Warden's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API