People v. Todd
California Supreme Court
Appeal from" a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The defendant was convicted of a forgery of a will, and from the judgment rendered against him this appeal is prosecuted.
The only point made for the reversal of the judgment is, that the court erred in not sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the indictment. It is claimed that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense.
To sustain this contention, the defendant asserts that the alleged forged will, which is set out in the indictment, does not show upon its face in what way Minerva J. Todd, the wife of the testator, the person alleged to have been injured, could…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ex parte FinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Harding v. CowingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BibbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. McPhersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- People v. WilmotIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. Di RyanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908