Sparks-Withington Co. v. E. A. Laboratories, Inc.

(after stating the facts as above). Concerning the later patent (1,355,283), it is only necessary to say that we agree with what was said about it by Campbell, District Judge, after he had found the earlier patent valid and infringed. Our views hereafter expressed as to that earlier patent render further discussion useless. There is no patentable invention in claim 1 of 1,355,283, and the decree below as to that patent is affirmed.

It is useless to go into details of construction, because we think it admitted, and, if not, proven, that the “motor horn” above described is in operating theory…