Legal Opinion
Cohan v. Riverside Park Place Condominium Ass'n
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 5, 1985No. Docket No. 76099PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
After Remand
2Per curiam
In this cause, plaintiff appeals as of right from a January 18, 1984, order of the Washtenaw Circuit Court denying plaintiffs motion brought under GCR 1963, 528.3 for relief from an October 3, 1980, judgment ordering plaintiff to submit to an inspection of unit 26 of Riverside *566Condominiums in Ann Arbor. The October 3, 1980, judgment was affirmed by this Court in Bruce E Cohan, MD, PC v Riverside Park Place Condominium Ass’n, Inc, 123 Mich App 743; 333 NW2d 574 (1983), lv den 417 Mich 1100.48 (1983). The basis of the present appeal is the trial court’s failure to consider the…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lark v. the Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Swinehart v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Kent County Aeronautics Board v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Cohan v. CONDO. ASS'N, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Meadow Bridge Condominium Ass'n v. BoscaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Daoud Mousa Janini v. London Townhouses Condominium AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.