Lark v. the Detroit Edison Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
These consolidated appeals arose out of two lawsuits brought against Detroit Edison Company (hereinafter Edison) for negligence in failing to provide two employees of Reliance Truck Company (hereafter Reliance) with a safe place to work._
In the fall of 1976, Edison was allowed to file third-party complaints against Reliance. Reliance subsequently filed motions for summary judgment on each third-party complaint. The motions were based on the fact that both Reliance and Edison were insured by Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company. Reliance argued that since it is impossible to sue oneself,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Freeman v. RemleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Kaleal v. KalealMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- O'Neill v. O'NeillMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kibby v. RhoadsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rose v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Limbach v. Oakland County Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Muntean v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Coates v. DrakeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jackson Printing Co, Inc v. MitanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.