Commonwealth Ex Rel. Maier v. Maier
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the lower court abused its discretion in entering a support order because (1) the court failed to properly determine appellant’s earning capacity and granted support in an amount in excess of one-third of his earning capacity; and (2) the portion of the order requiring appellant to pay appellee’s reasonable medical bills and commuting expenses is too indefinite to enforce. For the reasons which follow, we vacate the lower court’s order and remand the case.
The parties were married in 1947 and separated in 1975. Thereafter, appellee instituted an action to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Gutzeit v. GutzeitSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Commonwealth ex rel. McNulty v. McNultySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Wechsler v. WechslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Borrow v. BorrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- DeMasi v. DeMasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Beasley v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Gangwish v. GangwishNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Ochs v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Quamme v. BellinoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.