Legal Opinion
Heiko Goldenstein v. Repossessors Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 10, 2016No. 14-3554PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KRAUSE, Circuit Judge.
After he defaulted on a $1,000 loan and his car was repossessed, Appellant Heiko Goldenstein brought suit against Appellees Repossessors, Inc. and Shady Oak Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Premier Finance Adjusters and their individual owners, alleging the repossession was unlawful and seeking treble damages, attorney’s fees, and costs. Specifically, Goldenstein claimed violations of various state and federal consumer protection statutes, as well as the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). Because we conclude that the District Court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Emil Jutrowski v. Township of RiverdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Don Karns v. Kathleen ShanahanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Angel Anariba v. Director Hudson County CorrectCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Damien Preston v. Superintendent Graterford SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Liana Revock v. Cowpet Bay West Condominium AsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.