National Packaging Corporation v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha (NYK Line)
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WOLLENBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved that the Court strike defendant’s second affirmative defense on the grounds that the word “delivery” as used in § 1303(6) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA) 46 U.S.C. §§ 1300-1315 means actual physical transfer of goods from the carrier to the consignee. The meaning of the terms “delivery” and “proper delivery” are well established under the predecessor to COGSA, the Harter Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 190-195. Apparently, however, this is the first time an American court has been called upon to decide what the term means as used in COGSA in a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- J. Kinderman & Sons v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha LinesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
3Cited by16 opinions
- Servicios-Expoarma, C.A., and Orimpex-Zona Ind. Del Este v. Industrial Maritime Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Starrag Starrag-Heckert Inc. v. Maersk, Inc., a New York Corporation Maersk Pacific Ltd., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Orient Overseas Line v. Globemaster Baltimore, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Lithotip, CA v. S.S. GuaricoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Atlantic Mut. Ins. Companies v. M/V BALSA 38District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.