Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Brooks

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Circuit- Court, Webster County. Action by E. J. Salisbury against Arthur Brooks. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch, President:

On January 23, 1909, Salisbury and Brooks entered into the agreement out of which this controvery has arisen-. Is it a contract of sale, or a contract pf agency to sell the lumber manufactured from timber on lands owned and controlled by Salisbury in Webster county? The answer to that question virtually determines the issues between the parties. Construing it as a contract of sale, the trial court overruled the demurrer to the evidence interposed by defendant, after each party had introduced his proof before the jury, and entered judgment for plaintiff upon the conditional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Crislip v. CainWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hurst v. HurstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Myers v. CarnahanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cotiga Development Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Malcolm v. American Service Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Culbertson v. Jno. McCall Coal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1967
  4. Alderson v. Gauley Fuel Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Balasquide v. Guilhon & BarthelemySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API