Legal Opinion
Community Planning Board. No. 4 (Manhattan) v. Homes for the Homeless
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Helen E. Freedman, J.
This motion by defendants the City of New York, the Human Resources Administration of the City of New York (HRA), the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, the New York City Department of Buildings, and Elizabeth Holtzman, as Comptroller of the City of New York (collectively, the City defendants), and Homes for the Homeless (HFH) for summary judgment on the grounds that the complaint fails to state a cause of action and that plaintiffs’ claims are time barred is granted, and plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment declaring that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Town of Yorktown v. New York State Department of Mental HygieneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- MATTER OF TOWN OF YORKTOWN v. New York State Dep't of Mental HygieneNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Brush v. OlivoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Greenpoint Renaissance Enterprise Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Schweiss v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ferrer v. DinkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Rowe v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Waters v. DennisonNew York Supreme Court · 2007