Legal Opinion

People v. Podoll

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 26, 1993No. 93SA41PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The hearing board in this attorney disciplinary proceeding concluded that- the respondent violated the Code of Professional Responsibility and recommended that he receive a private censure. A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the board’s findings and rec ommendation. The assistant disciplinary counsel has excepted to the recommended discipline as too lenient, and the respondent contends that the complaint should have been dismissed. We approve the board’s findings, but conclude that a public censure is appropriate given the seriousness of the misconduct.

I

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. People v. FinesilverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. People v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. In the Matter of James C. WollrabSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  3. People v. LutzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. BerkleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. People v. EsslingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API