Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Entrekin

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1950No. 37483PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Mrs. Slaella Ladner Boyd and three other surviving heirs of Andrew J. Ladner, brought their suit against M. E. Entrekin and the Gulf Refining Company seeking to have themselves declared to be the exclusive owners of a 4/5 interest in the land involved in this cause. The answer denied all the allegations of the bill, raised bars thereto under the statutes of limitation, and was also made a cross bill, with a prayer for confirmation of their title as against the complainants. From a decree dismissing their bill with prejudice and granting the relief prayed for in the cross bill, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peeples v. BotkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Barksdale v. LearnardMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Watson v. VinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Dickerson v. WeeksMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Federal Land Bank v. McCraneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Gaddis & McLaurin, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Smith v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Jordon v. WarrenMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Alewine v. PitcockMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Tadlock v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API