Legal Opinion
Clements v. Hearne
Texas Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. John C. Easton.
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Associate Justice.
The errors assigned for the reversal of this cáse are—
“ 1st. The court erred in its general charge to the jury.
“ 2d. The court erred in giving the instructions asked by plaintiff’s counsel, and in refusing the instructions asked by defendants’ counsel.
“ 3d. The court erred in overruling defendants’ motion for ■a new trial.”
The grounds for a new trial, as shown by the motion, are— “ 1st. The court erred in its charge to the jury.
“ 2d. The court erred in giving the instructions asked by plaintiff’s counsel.
■ “ 3d. The court erred in refusing the special instructions…
2Cited by16 opinions
- P. Lorillard Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- First National Bank v. William R. Trigg Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- Miller v. Fenner, Beane & UngerleiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Puckett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Cameron v. FayTexas Supreme Court · 1881
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.