United States v. Joshua Bevill

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Joshua Bevill (“Bevill”) appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss his indictment because, according to Bevill, his prosecution violated an earlier plea agreement he had entered into with the Government. Because Bevill’s asserted understanding of his prior plea agreement is unreasonable, we affirm the district court’s denial of his motion.

I. BACKGROUND

In November 2010, the Government charged Bevill in an information with engaging in securities fraud. The information alleged that “[beginning in or about November 2005 and continuing until in…